|
New to Ham Radio?
My Profile
Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question
Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation
Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers
Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net
|
|
1-10 of 15 messages
|
  Page 1 of 2  
Next
|
|
Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by K5AKG on September 20, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
What are the advantages of one over the other? Are they electrically interchangeable as far as the transmitter is concerned?
Alan K5AKG
Bristow, VA
|
|   |
|
RE: Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by AA4PB on September 20, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
A dual paddle is used for an iambic keyer. For example, if you close the dit side just ahead of the dah side and hold the two closed the keyer will send a continuous string of dit-dah-dit-dah. It also works the opposite way when you close the dah side first.
A dual paddle can be used with a non-iambic keyer and even with an iambic keyer the user does not have to use "squeeze keying" for the iambic feature.
A single paddle can also be used with either type of keyer but you won't be able to use "squeeze keying" to access the iambic function.
If it were me, I'd purchase a dual paddle because it is the most universal.
|
|   |
|
RE: Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by WB2WIK on September 20, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Dual paddle is more flexible and all I ever use.
I do use iambic keying ("squeeze" keying, so to speak) and you can't do that with a single lever paddle. It makes sending less effort, if you do a lot of sending.
WB2WIK/6
|
|   |
|
RE: Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by N5XM on September 20, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I use a single lever Kent and the Vibroplex deluxe single lever. I have a small hand and like the lower profile of the Kent. The Vibroplex is a joy to use. Either way, single or double, choose whatever you like, and get on the air.
|
|   |
|
RE: Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by W8ZNX on September 21, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
its a matter of personal taste
ive used each
its hard to find a realy great single lever paddle
most builders tend to iambic lash up
i don't care for iambic sending
just screws up my bug style
so i simply slap the paddles same as a bug
play around
what one op loves
another op can not stand
same key ten ops simply love
same key ten other ops simply hate
dit dit
Mac
|
|   |
|
RE: Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by W8ZNX on September 21, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
its a matter of personal taste
ive used each
don't care for iambic sending
screws up my bug style
so simply slap the paddles
play around
same key ten ops
simply love
same key ten other ops
simply hate
dit dit
Mac
|
|   |
|
RE: Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by W9OY on September 21, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I have thousands invested in iambic paddles. That being said I am now totally sold on single lever paddles. The whole "squeeze keying is easier" thing is a fraud. As best I can see iambic keying is a feature in search of a need. Single lever paddles have less degrees of freedom so to speak and therefore less mistake making potential. To speak of sending with a single lever as "extra work" is silly especially if you make even 1% more errors with the iambic paddle. That argument has commonly been made since the advent of the accu-keyer but it is just that an argument, not a fact as is often proffered. In fact if you learn to send with a single lever you have the most versatility since a SL man can switch to an iambic paddle with ease while going the other way is not intuitive. It is YOU not the paddle that sends the code.
As far as what paddle to choose, I like the Kent SL for a moderately priced paddle and I like the Begali Mono Simplex, but my favorite is this paddle:
http://www.n3znkeys.com/modelznSL1.html
It is an absolute dream key.
73 W9OY
|
|   |
|
RE: Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by KB1OOO on September 21, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I've only used an iambic paddle but here's what I've surmised from the previous discussions which you should also read if you are interested (do a search in the top right search box on iambic).
Advantages:
Dual: iambic keying is a bit less physical effort so you'll probably last longer if you are sending for hours. Also, dual paddles are more ubiquitous so when you go to a buddy's shack, or to field day, you'll be more likely to find a dual paddle.
Single: There seems to be some evidence that you can send more accurately with a single lever paddle at your upper speed limit. DJ1YFK (one of 2 people on the planet to reach 200wpm RUFZ copy in an official competition) has said that all the ops winning the high speed telegraphy sending competitions are using single lever paddles.
To answer your other question: electronically, there shouldn't be any issues.
As an aside, you probably shouldn't sweat it, just pick one and go for it. I learned on a dual paddle and I'll probably try a single lever paddle in the near future. Nothing lost if I end up liking the single better. Same goes for which model to buy. Just pick one of the popular ones and you can change later.
73,
Marc
|
|   |
|
RE: Single v. Double Paddle
|
Reply
|
|
by N3DF on September 21, 2008
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
The advantage of a single paddle key is that, if you learned to key in the era before iambic keyers, you can keep using the single paddle key and don't have to re-learn a skill. If you are just learning to use a key and keyer for the first time today, the only sensible course of action is to use a double paddle key.
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
Forum, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Forum Manager.
|
|
|